| baobao |
2006-08-30 09:31 |
4 *eQ4%,^@y In science the meaning of the word “explain” suffers with civilization’s every step in search of reality. Science can not really explain electricity, magnetism, and gravitation; their effects can be measured and predicted, but of their nature no more is known to the modern scientist than to Thales who first speculated on the electrification of amber. Most contemporary physicists reject the notion that man can ever discover what these mysterious forces “really” are. Electricity, Bertrand Russell says, “is not a thing, like St. Paul’s Cathedral; it is a way in which things behave. When we have told how things behave when they are electrified, we have told all thee is to tell.” Until recently scientists would have disapproved of such an idea. Aristotle, for example, whose natural science dominated Western thought for two thousand years, believed that man could arrive at an understanding of reality by reasoning from self-evident principles. He felt, for example, that it is a self-evident principle that everything in the universe has its proper place, hence one can conclude that objects fall to the ground because that is where they belong, and smoking goes up because that is where it belongs. The goal of Aristotelian science was to explain why things happen. Modern science was born when Galileo began trying to explain how things happen and thus originated the method of controlled experiment which now forms the basis of scientific investigation. DN4EVi' 31. The aim of controlled scientific experiments is . R6}g=+A A. to explain why things happen i_"KgnS# B. to explain how things happen _H,! c8C C. to describe self-evident principles o:uzm2|
D. to support Aristotelian science ^A/bNhF 32. what principles most influenced scientific thought for two thousand years? _k$5ibmV A. The speculations of Thales I>Cc)m`A| B. The forces of electricity, magnetism, and gravity }snr
65 C. Aristotle’s natural science KkkxKHuu0 D. Galileo’s discoveries ";&ZDH4@Y 33. Bertrand Russell’s notion about electricity is . ?nW+pb A. disapproved of by most modern scientists QFq^Atjr B. in agreement with Aristotle’s theory of self-evident principles 9+`7!J C. in agreement with scientific investigation directed toward “how” things happen &% '1} D. in agreement with scientific investigation directed toward “why ” things happen g/T}F[ 34. The passage says that until recently scientists disagreed with the idea . CyZO<4I& A. that there are mysterious forces in the universe c,U[O 6e9] B. that man can not discover what forces “really” are P0Py}CXh C. that there are self-evident principles ieu" <Wc D. that we can discover why things behave as they do 51k{NVgt 35. Which of the following is the topic most likely to be discussed right after the passage? ugf5- A. The most recent definition of “explain” \K-HQ:ds B. The relationship between science and religion tQC5+Ea
NI C. The limitations of science `L?+>%q D. Galileo and the birth of modern science. G^sFf g# 1+A_Lw(\ 5 JpWH; Some weeks ago, riding in a cab from Boston to Cambridge, my driver turned and asked me what I did for a living . “Teach English”, I said. “Is that so? ” The young man continued. “I was an English major” But then, instead of chatting idly about Joyce or dropping the subject altogether, this driver caught me short. “You guys,” he said, turning back so that his furry face pressed into the glass partition, “ought to be shot” I think he meant it . Jq)c`Si The guilty party in this present state of affairs is not really the academic discipline. It is not the fault of English and philosophy and biology that engineering and accounting and computer science afford students better job opportunities and increased flexibility in career choice. Literature and an understanding of, say, man’s evolutionary past are as important as ever. They simply are no longer perceived in today’s market as salable. That is a harsh economic fact. And it is not only true in the United States. Employment prospects for liberal arts graduates in Canada, for example, are said to be the worst since the 1930s. QV?_xvn/` What to do? I think it would be shortsighted for colleges and universities to advise students against majoring in certain subjects that do not appear linked (at least directly) to careers. Where our energies should be directed instead is toward the development of educational programs that combine course sequences in the liberal arts with course in the viable professions. Double majors---one for enrichment, one for earning one’s bread---have never been promoted very seriously in our institutions of higher learning, mainly because liberal arts and professional-vocational faculties have long been suspicious or contemptuous of one another. Thus students have been directed to one path or the other, to the disadvantage of both students and faculty. w8z :-e2 A hopeful cue could be taken, it seems to me, from new attempts in the health profession(nursing and pharmacy, for example), where jobs are still plentiful, to give the humanities and social sciences a greater share of the curriculum. Why could not the traditional history major in the college of arts and sciences be pointed toward additional courses in the business school, or to engineering, or to physical therapy? This strategy requires a new commitment from both the institution and the student and demands a much harder look at the allocation of time and resources. But in an age of adversity, double majors are one way liberal arts students can more effectively prepare for the world outside. *t] !>2_0 36. What is the chief purpose of double majors? U4o&? 6j A. To help graduates of history major become successful businessmen.
v(
w%u# B. To provide liberal arts graduates with a method of meeting effectively the challenge in employment. j:ODI C. To extend their knowledge learnt in the college. ]CU1z,| D. To moderate the tension between liberal arts and vocational faculties. UH:mT;|I 37. In paragraph 1, the sentence “You guys ought to be shot” shows that at heart the driver . mUA;zNbO A. felt greatly regretted about the major he had chosen 5A?^g B. felt a deep hatred for all the English teachers in his former college (#$e- C. complained that his teachers hadn’t taught him how to survive in this competitive society. L15qHQ;? D. held a deep contempt in the author because of his scholastic manner !$8>$U' 38. It can be inferred from the passage that the blame for the present state of affairs lies in the fact that . yko(7 A. the course sequences themselves are unreliable. _QFSHu\i3 B. more and more students start to select science majors _7o1qsM C. almost none of the specialties the students major in might be salable in today’s market ?Zvfa0p.
. D. the opportunities of employment are scarce for graduates of non-science majors rStui* 39. The obstacles in course sequences in academic schooling are indicated in all of the following EXCEPT . |-c?Gj%Ui A. the misguidance of major-selection in some of the institutions of higher learning iQ&N68<%[_ B. the current curriculum couldn’t keep up with the development of the society p`%`<W C. the inharmonious relation among the teaching faculties y,_B w D. the authorities of higher learning attach only little importance to course sequences LGvnw 40. This passage can best be titled as . d !P42VYn A. Harsh Economic Fact T3{BB25 B. Double Majors, a Way Out xiqCkG1E1 C. Careers, Schooling fro Better Ys{` `nW D. Market for Graduates |
|